Monday, May 20th 2013, 10:49pm UTC+2

You are not logged in.

  • Login
  • Register

shadow00

Trainee

Posts: 68

Number of monitoring servers: 1

Nagios Version: 3.0

Distributed monitoring: Nein

Redundant monitoring: Nein

Number of hosts: 45

Number of services: 30

OS: CentOS

Plugin Version: 1.4

NDO Version: 1

1

Friday, February 24th 2012, 10:47am

Nagios stable release

Hi!

I am in plan of installing new server with latest release nagios-3.3.1.tar.gz. I saw a thread on and thought to check that should i go the latest release or previous one i.e.
nagios-3.2.3.tar.gz

http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/…013#post4610013
http://tracker.nagios.org/view.php?id=247

Thanks

dnsmichi

Super Moderator

Posts: 5,978

Birthday: May 30th 1983 (29)

Gender: male

Location: Nürnberg

Occupation: Consultant / Developer beim besten Arbeitgeber der Welt @netways

Number of monitoring servers: Icinga: 4x dev, 10++ prod, Icinga2: 2x dev

Nagios Version: s/nagios/icinga/

Icinga Version: 1.9.0 / GIT

Distributed monitoring: Ja

Redundant monitoring: Ja

Number of hosts: 1000+

Number of services: 15000+

OS: RHEL, Debian, SUSE

Plugin Version: 1.4.16

IDO-Version: 1.9.0 / GIT MySQL/Postgresql/Oracle

Other Addons: Icinga Web, PNP, check_multi, inGraph, EventDB, LConf

2

Friday, February 24th 2012, 2:46pm

right. 3.3.1 is buggy and not advised to be used in production. 3.2.3 is the latest "stable" if you wanna call it like that. there's one bug with retaining host alias and displayname - that is fixed in the omd integrated nagios core.
+++ Icinga / LConf Developer +++ Senior Consultant at []NETWAYS> +++
+++ Icinga 1.9 || Icinga 2 +++ Icinga Support || IRC +++

shadow00

Trainee

Posts: 68

Number of monitoring servers: 1

Nagios Version: 3.0

Distributed monitoring: Nein

Redundant monitoring: Nein

Number of hosts: 45

Number of services: 30

OS: CentOS

Plugin Version: 1.4

NDO Version: 1

3

Tuesday, February 28th 2012, 2:33pm

Thanks.